Category Archives: Palestine / Israel

Israeli war crimes condemned

News Bulletin 170
December 30, 2008

Israeli and Palestinian Civil Society Condemns Israeli “War Crimes” in Gaza

December 30, 2008, Jerusalem: Human rights groups in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories are calling for international sanctions against Israel following deadly bombing raids that have killed more than 375 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

A statement by the Alternative Information Center (AIC), a joint Israeli-Palestinian organization based in Jerusalem and the West Bank, described the Israeli attacks as “blatant war crimes” and called for the indictment of Israel’s leaders, including Foreign Affairs Minister Tzipi Livni and Minister of Defense Ehud Barak. The AIC is a partner of The Advocacy Project (AP).

“Israel’s military attack on the Gaza Strip is not, as Israel is attempting to claim today, retaliation against Gazan resistance to the Israeli occupation and ongoing siege of the Gaza Strip, but part of a publicly admitted political goal of eliminating the Hamas government in Gaza,” said AIC Executive Director Connie Hackbarth.

“Israel is exploiting the last moments of the Bush administration to implement the deadly but ineffective neoconservative policies of utilizing military force to effect political change.”

Israeli warplanes bombed Gaza for the fourth straight day today. Medical facilities in Gaza, already facing shortages, cannot cope with the growing number of casualties.

In many places, there is no running water or electricity, and food is becoming scarce. The Gaza branch coordinator for the Democracy and Workers’ Rights Center (DWRC), an AP partner, reported to colleagues in Ramallah that more than 20 people have crowded into his apartment in an effort to keep safe from missiles.

“I have never experienced a situation like this,” he said. “Every time the Israeli warplanes bomb a target in our area, we tell the youngest children that the explosions are firecrackers or fireworks, in an attempt to diminish their fears… Since the start of the operation, we have no electricity and now we have no water anymore.”

Palestinian groups have called for an immediate end to Israel’s attacks on Gaza and urged the international community to intervene. The DWRC issued a call for solidarity with the people of Gaza and appealed to trade unions worldwide to protest.

Demonstrations against the Israeli attacks have occurred throughout the West Bank, and 2,000 protesters attended a joint Palestinian-Israeli demonstration in Tel Aviv on Saturday. The AIC has planned a candlelight vigil for the victims of Gaza tonight in Beit Sahour, a suburb of Bethlehem.

According to the AIC, many of the deaths occurred after Israeli planes targeted Palestinian police in civilian population centers in Gaza. The attacks also coincided with the end of the school day, resulting in the deaths of numerous children. Willful killings are a grave breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention under Article 147 and therefore, a war crime.

Palestinian human rights groups are urging the United Nations Security Council to call an emergency session and demand that Israel respect international humanitarian law. The groups are asking parties to the Geneva Conventions to hold Israel accountable, especially with regard to protecting civilians.

According to the AIC, Israel first violated the Gaza ceasefire in early November, by killing six Palestinians and wounding four. In addition, Israel has kept Gaza’s 1.5 million residents essentially under siege since June 2007, when the Palestinian faction Hamas took control of the government in Gaza.

Israel has routinely closed Gaza’s borders to the passage of people and essential goods, creating a major humanitarian crisis. Most Gazans are now dependent on food assistance. Fuel shortages disrupt running water and electricity, and hospitals lack lifesaving medicines.

● Read AIC’s coverage of the Gaza crisis

● Read the DWRC’s account from civilians in Gaza

AdvocacyNet is a service of The Advocacy Project (AP) that is offered to advocates working for human rights and social justice at the community level. AP is based in Washington, DC. Phone +1 202 332 3900; fax +1 202 332 4600. For more information visit our website or email us.

Subscribe to the Advocacy Project news service with RSS

Free Gaza

I’ve been following the progress of two boats of human rights campaigners which sailed into Gaza yesterday unmolested by Israeli security. The Free Gaza movement organised the voyage to break the Israeli blockade. SS Free Gaza and SS Liberty made the 350 mile journey from Cyprus, despite determined efforts by Israeli government spokespeople to deter them with threats of intervention. Amongst those onboard was journalist Lauren Booth, sister-in-law of Tony Blair. Whilst primarily a human rights action  to draw attetnion to the injustice of the Israeli stanglehold on Gaza, the boats also carried humanitarian aid for the people of the territory who are facing severe shortages of essential supplies. Included in the cargo were hundreds of hearing aids for children whose hearing has been damaged by the Israeli practice of flying jets over the population to saturate them with sonic booms.

Paul Larudee, co-founder of the Free Gaza movement said:

“We’re the first ones in 41 years to enter Gaza freely – but we won’t be the last. We welcome the world to join us and see what we’re seeing.”

Read more and donate

Do I boycott Israeli goods? Is the Pope Catholic?

I believe Israel has a right to exist and its people to be secure within internationally acceptable borders But it is illegally occupying Palestinian territories and illegally infringing severely the international human rights of the majority of Palestinian people and has been for the last 40 years.  This is unacceptable. The people of Gaza and the West bank are human beings with as much right to live and flourish on earth as the citizens of Israel. As the occupying power Israel bears a major part of the responsibility for finding a just solution to this conflict. Both sides will have to make compromises over their current demands,  but there can be no compromise about the need for an end to injustice. Just as the South African state would not move on the issue of apartheid without concerted international economic and cultural pressure so I believe Israel will not either. So I support the boycott of Israeli goods and the academic boycott. This article on the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign website expresses a valid view I believe though in stronger language than I would use – but then I have the security of citizenship in a strong powerful and secure state.

Campaign for peace with justice for Israelis and Palestinians

The Enough! coalition is holding a major national rally on Saturday 9th June in London. More details here. The coalition of a range of groups is campaigning  for a just peace for all people in Israel and Palestine and calling on the British government to stand up for international law and human rights in pursuit of peace based on justice, equality and freedom for Israelis and Palestinians alike.

Jimmy Carter on Palestine

Jimmy Carter is clear that the responsibility for the injustice facing Palestine is Israel’s. 

Here is a summary of what Carter said written by Norman Finkelstein.

The historical chapters of Palestine Peace Not Apartheid are rather thin, filled with errors small and large, as well as tendentious and untenable interpretations. But few persons will be reading it for the history.

It is what Carter has to say about the present that will interest the reading public and the media (assuming the book is not ignored). It can be said with certainty that Israel’s apologists will not be pleased. Although Carter includes criticisms of the Palestinians to affect balance, it is clear that he holds Israel principally responsible for the impasse in the peace process. The most scathing criticisms of Israel come in Chapter 16 (“The Wall as a Prison”). One hopes that this chapter (and the concluding “Summary”) will be widely disseminated.

Below I reproduce some of Carter’s key statements.


Most Arab regimes have accepted the permanent existence of Israel as an indisputable fact and are no longer calling for an end to the State of Israel, having contrived a common statement at an Arab summit in 2002 that offers peace and normal relations with Israel within its acknowledged international borders and in compliance with other U.N. Security Council resolutions. (p. 14)

Since 1924, Shebaa Farms has been treated as Lebanese territory, but Syria seized the area in the 1950s and retained control until Israel occupied the Farms–along with the Golan Heights–in 1967. The inhabitants and properties were Lebanese, and Lebanon has never accepted Syria’s control of the Farms. Although Syria has claimed the area in the past, Syrian officials now state that it is part of Lebanon. This position supports the Arab claim that Israel still occupies Lebanese territory. (pp. 98-9)

The best offer to the Palestinians [at Camp David in December 2000]–by Clinton, not Barak–had been to withdraw 20 percent of the settlers, leaving more than 180,000 in 209 settlements, covering about 10 percent of the occupied land, including land to be “leased” and portions of the Jordan River valley and East Jerusalem.

The percentage figure is misleading, since it usually includes only the actual footprints of the settlements. There is a zone with a radius of about four hundred meters around each settlement within which Palestinians cannot enter. In addition, there are other large areas that would have been taken or earmarked to be used exclusively by Israel, roadways that connect the settlements to one another and to Jerusalem, and “life arteries” that provide the settlers with water, sewage, electricity, and communications. These range in width from five hundred to four thousand meters, and Palestinians cannot use or cross many of these connecting links. This honeycomb of settlements and their interconnecting conduits effectively divide the West Bank into at least two noncontiguous areas and multiple fragments, often uninhabitable or even unreachable, and control of the Jordan Valley denies Palestinians any direct access eastward into Jordan. About one hundred military checkpoints completely surround Palestinians and block routes going into or between Palestinian communities, combined with an unaccountable number of other roads that are permanently closed with large concrete cubes or mounds of earth and rocks.

There was no possibility that any Palestinian leader could accept such terms and survive, but official statements from Washington and Jerusalem were successful in placing the entire onus for the failure on Yasir Arafat. (pp. 151-2)

A new round of talks was held at Taba in January 2001, during the last few days of the Clinton presidency, between President Arafat and the Israeli foreign minister, and it was later claimed that the Palestinians rejected a “generous offer” put forward by Prime Minister Barak with Israel keeping only 5 percent of the West Bank. The fact is that no such offers were ever made. Barak later said, “It was plain to me that there was no chance of reaching a settlement at Taba. Therefore I said there would be no negotiations and there would be no delegation and there would be no official discussions and no documentation. Nor would Americans be present in the room. The only thing that took place at Taba were nonbinding contacts between senior Israelis and senior Palestinians. (p. 152)

In April 2003 a “Roadmap” for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was announced by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on behalf of the United States, the United Nations, Russia, and the European Union (known as the Quartet).The Palestinians accepted the road map in its entirety but the Israeli government announced fourteen caveats and prerequisites, some of which would preclude any final peace talks. (p. 159)

“Imprisonment wall” is more descriptive than “security fence.” (p. 174)

Gaza has maintained a population growth rate of 4.7 percent annually, one of the highest in the world, so more than half its people are less than fifteen years old. They are being strangled since the Israeli “withdrawal,” surrounded by a separation barrier that is penetrated only by Israeli-controlled checkpoints, with just a single opening (for personnel only) into Egypt’s Sinai as their access to the outside world. There have been no moves by Israel to permit transportation by sea or by air. Fishermen are not permitted to leave the harbor, workers are prevented from going to outside jobs, the import or export of food and other goods is severely restricted and often cut off completely, and the police, teachers, nurses, and social workers are deprived of salaries. Per capita income has decreased 40 percent during the last three years, and the poverty rate has reached 70 percent. The U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food has stated that acute malnutrition in Gaza is already on the same scale as that seen in the poorer countries of the Southern Sahara, with more than half of Palestinian families eating only one meal a day. (p. 176).

The area between the segregation barrier and the Israeli border has been designated a closed military region for an indefinite period of time. Israeli directives state that every Palestinian over the age of twelve living in the closed area has to obtain a “permanent resident permit” from the civil administration to enable them to continue to live in their own homes. They are considered to be aliens, without the rights of Israeli citizens.

To summarize: whatever territory Israel decides to confiscate will be on its side of the wall, but Israelis will still retain control of the Palestinians who will be on the other side of the barrier, enclosed between it and Israel’s forces in the Jordan River valley. (pp. 192-3)

The wall ravages many places along its devious route that are important to Christians. In addition to enclosing Bethlehem in one of its most notable intrusions, an especially heartbreaking division is on the southern slope of the Mount of Olives, a favorite place for Jesus and his disciples, and very near Bethany, where they often visited Mary, Martha, and their brother, Lazarus. There is a church named for one of the sisters, Santa Marta Monastery, where Israel’s thirty-foot concrete wall cuts through the property. The house of worship is now on the Jerusalem side, and its parishioners are separated from it because they cannot get permits to enter Jerusalem. Its priest, Father Claudio Ghilardi, says, “For nine hundred years we have lived here under Turkish, British, Jordanian, and Israeli governments, and no one has ever stopped people coming to pray. It is scandalous. This is not about a barrier. It is a border. Why don’t they speak the truth?”

Countering Israeli arguments that the wall is to keep Palestinian suicide bombers from Israel, Father Claudio adds a comment that describes the path of the entire barrier: “The Wall is not separating Palestinians from Jews; rather Palestinians from Palestinians.” Nearby are three convents that will also be cut off from the people they serve. The 2,000 Palestinian Christians have lost their place of worship and their spiritual center. (pp. 194-5)

International human rights organizations estimate that since 1967 more than 630,000 Palestinians (about 20 percent of the total population) in the occupied territories have been detained at some time by the Israelis, arousing deep resentment among the families involved. Although the vast majority of prisoners are men, there are a large number of women and children being held. Between the ages of twelve and fourteen, children can be sentenced for a period of up to six months, and after the age of fourteen Palestinian children are tried as adults, a violation of international law. (pp. 196-7)

The unwavering official policy of the United States since Israel became a state has been that its borders must coincide with those prevailing from 1949 until 1967 (unless modified by mutually agreeable land swaps), specified in the unanimously adopted U.N. Resolution 242, which mandates Israel’s withdrawal from occupied territories. This obligation was reconfirmed by Israel’s leaders in agreements negotiated in 1978 at Camp David and in 1993 at Oslo, for which they received the Nobel Peace Prize, and both of these commitments were officially ratified by the Israeli government. Also, as a member of the International Quartet that includes Russia, the United Nations, and the European Union, America supports the Roadmap for Peace, which espouses exactly the same requirements. Palestinian leaders unequivocally accepted this proposal, but Israel has officially rejected its key provisions with unacceptable caveats and prerequisites.

The overriding problem is that, for more than a quarter century, the actions of some Israeli leaders have been in direct conflict with the official policies of the United States, the international community, and their own negotiated agreements.Israel’s continued control and colonization of Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Holy Land. In order to perpetuate the occupation, Israeli forces have deprived their unwilling subjects of basic human rights. No objective person could personally observe existing conditions in the West Bank and dispute these statements. (pp. 207-9)

The United States has used its U.N. Security Council veto more than forty times to block resolutions critical of Israel. Some of these vetoes have brought international discredit on the United States, and there is little doubt that the lack of a persistent effort to resolve the Palestinian issue is a major source of anti-American sentiment and terrorist activity throughout the Middle East and the Islamic world. (pp. 209-10)

The bottom line is this: Peace will come to Israel and the Middle East only when the Israeli government is willing to comply with international law, with the Roadmap for Peace, with official American policy, with the wishes of a majority of its own citizens–and honors its own previous commitments–by accepting its legal borders. All Arab neighbors must pledge to honor Israel’s right to live in peace under these conditions. The United States is squandering international prestige and goodwill and intensifying global anti-American terrorism by unofficially condoning or abetting the Israeli confiscation and colonization of Palestinian territories. (p. 216)